Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 16 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 432
54% 413 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.2
24% 33.4 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 31.7
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 379 330 245 203 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 474
Mixed 440
SusWrite 284
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.4
194% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 336
253% 337 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE604 12TB
5TB free
Firmware: LEGNW925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 187 188 187 188 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 136%
SanDisk Extreme 55AE 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 55ae
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 213 219 230 231 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 249
Mixed 238
SusWrite 221
325% 238 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 47.3
4,238% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 52.4
4,796% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 318%
Great: 379%
SABRENT 14TB
13TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 235 241 247 247 247 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 255
Write 253
Mixed 124
SusWrite 240
290% 218 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
324% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97E-ITX/ac - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback