Sony Reserved

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemSony Reserved  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 07 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 104
42% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 132
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sony(104D 9071) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.9
1% 2 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 192 197 197 209 219 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 208
Write 207
Mixed 208
SusWrite 200
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 25.2
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 178
134% 179 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 128%
SABRENT DISK00 160GB
128GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 42 42 43 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 39
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 41.9
52% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
SABRENT DISK02 120GB
91GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.1 1.2 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Read 41.2
Write 43.1
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 1.8
36% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 167%
SABRENT DISK03 240GB
133GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 41 42 43 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 139
Write 90.9
Mixed 114
SusWrite 41.5
122% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 13.5
1,147% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 17.5
1,552% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 198%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 17.1" 1280 720 SNY06FA
Typical Reserved Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony Reserved

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback