Packard EasyNote LJ75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote LJ75  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote LJ75
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '22 at 11:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 47.3
1-Core 35
2-Core 40.6
28% 41 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 57.1
7% 54.5 Pts
64-Core 56.7
4% 56.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 031C) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2OA90P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 45 53 64 61 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 47
Write 51.5
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 58.3
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote LJ75 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LJ75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback