Packard EasyNote LM85

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Packard EasyNote LM85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV71_CP
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '23 at 22:32
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 430 14,318 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 60 2-Core 94.2 42% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 130 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0379) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	3.84% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 4.2 4% 4.93 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.84% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH6-CE120-G 120GB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 146 Write 103 Mixed 106 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 14.4 64% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 48 DQ Mixed 27.8 23% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 23.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 11.5 16% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown FSFF65F-C8KF9 1x4GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	12	60	18.1"	1280 720	SEC3051

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote LM85 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote LM85

CPU
Pentium P6100IntelBench 35%, 6,283 samples	5x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	5x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	9x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	9x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 29%, 2,059 samples	5x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	2x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16