Intel NUC8v7PNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel(R) NUC8v7PNK
MotherboardIntel NUC8v7PNB  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '23 at 12:55
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 203
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 486
47% 388 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1307 1175 1345 1339 1204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1874
Write 1,523
Mixed 1502
SusWrite 1,282
347% 1,545 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 72.7
228% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 690
520% 693 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 256%
Great: 429%
Crucial_ CT250MX200SSD1 250GB
33GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 35 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
Read 50.7
Write 36.3
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 35.6
52% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 10.3
664% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FRS Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 5R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 20% 51 96 29 60 32" 1296 759 CHO0030 Smart TV
Typical NUC8v7PNB Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8v7PNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback