Intel NUC8v7PNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8v7PNK
MotherboardIntel NUC8v7PNB  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '23 at 11:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8665U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 485
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Intel(8086 2096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 7.3
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1366 1290 1451 1390 1179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,956
Write 1,687
Mixed 1619
SusWrite 1,340
371% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 77.9
251% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 733
DQ Mixed 808
588% 763 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 272%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FRS Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 32" 1280 720 CHO0030 Smart TV
Typical NUC8v7PNB Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8v7PNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback