Today's hottest deals

Micro Mercury series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicro Mercury series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BRC
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230531
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '23 at 23:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Memory 8.54
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 183
44% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 118
10% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.1
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 36.5
16% 27.1 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 20
Splatting 12.5
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1103 1415 1675 1542 1381 1437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 753
Write 1,040
Mixed 923
SusWrite 1,425
236% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 14.8
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 75.2
DQ Mixed 84.1
64% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 348%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 26.2
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.8
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 417
10% 417 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mercury series Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Micro Mercury series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback