Micro Mercury series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro Mercury series  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BRC
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 15:37
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 66.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 328
94% 183 Pts
4-Core 624
8-Core 919
96% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,207
75% 1,207 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.2% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 58.3
25% 42.9 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 17.8
20% 25.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFKBO.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2134 2353 2589 2769 2947 2771 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 1,851
Write 4,039
Mixed 2,327
SusWrite 2,594
616% 2,703 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 83
295% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 1,003
749% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 368%
Great: 368%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 250GB
152GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 140 65 106 141 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung H58G66AK6BX070N 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 38.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 28.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 32" 1280 720 BBY0000 NS-22D510NA19
Typical Mercury series Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Micro Mercury series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback