Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15 XE4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive482% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 15 XE4  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '23 at 12:58
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 69.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 353
103% 199 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,162
108% 899 Pts
64-Core 1,987
123% 1,987 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 85E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 193
Parallax 170
142% 179 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 132
Splatting 119
118% 148 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 127%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3457 3711 3743 1874 1875 1873 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 2,898
Write 3,621
Mixed 2,587
SusWrite 2,756
670% 2,965 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 120
412% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 1,770
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,657
1,218% 1,604 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 482%
Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 36.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 24
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 15 XE4 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 15 XE4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback