Today's hottest deals

AZW SER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAZW SER  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SER
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 62
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
89% 170 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 812
85% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,022
63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 31.7
18% 25.1 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 26.1
Splatting 22.1
18% 21.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 1123 868 301 286 981 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,272
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 788
294% 1322 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 39.7
187% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 587
DQ Mixed 430
343% 473 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 206%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SER Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: AZW SER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback