User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardMAXSUN MS-B250D4L FS M.2
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170916
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 12 '17 at 03:45
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 681
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 34.2
34% 34.7 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1217A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 507
Write 317
Mixed 413
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 22.3
136% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 20.8
59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
913GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 178
Mixed 157
133% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.34
112% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
610GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46% Average
Read 116
Write 112
Mixed 75.3
126% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 22.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 24.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback