Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 19:17
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 208
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 453
61% 454 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 26
Parallax 31.6
20% 27.2 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 24
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 166 166 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68% Good
Read 480
Write 168
Mixed 203
SusWrite 165
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 23.5
96% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 181
144% 203 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 174 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 151
Mixed 102
SusWrite 173
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback