HP h9-1170

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP h9-1170  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory5.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120413
Uptime19.9 Days
Run DateJun 04 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 122
55% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 336
34% 279 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
HP(103C 6886) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 21.1
Parallax 22.6
12% 19.4 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.1
11% 14 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: U0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 240 255 257 278 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 316
Write 252
Mixed 277
SusWrite 261
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 25.1
118% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 264
213% 303 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78%
Great: 227%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 49 50 109 124 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 123
Write 130
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 87.2
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CK0 10GB
1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1170 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP h9-1170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback