Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 14:54
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 509
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 629
39% 629 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 43.4
49% 46.1 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 35.3
32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 178 180 178 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 277
Write 298
Mixed 283
SusWrite 178
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 150
127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 175 176 178 179 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 115 114 115 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 114
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
754GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 46.9
Write 69
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 74.5
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 133 144 146 141 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 90.1
Write 96.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 142
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 92%
ASMT ASM105x 120GB
24GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 138 138 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 280
Write 150
Mixed 183
SusWrite 137
236% 188 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 16.8
1,345% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 33.9
DQ Mixed 22.6
1,997% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
635GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 43.4
Write 57.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 97.6
81% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2000EL Series 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback