Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 630
64% 516 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1302 MHz, MLim: 1505 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 49.1
57% 57.8 fps
MRender 49.7
Gravity 44.2
Splatting 38.6
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37480G 480GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 183 62 23 31 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.6% Poor
Read 119
Write 95.2
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 82.8
21% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 10.5
43% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 13.7
10% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 102%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
53GB free
Firmware: 5.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 129 125 130 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 420
Write 146
Mixed 194
SusWrite 128
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 37
131% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 125
104% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
823GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 147 145 146 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 144
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 97.8
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 97
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 98.2
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 67%
WD easystore 2625 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 107 106 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 106
131% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.8
325% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 0.6
406% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2000EL Series 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,163
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback