HP 700-110es

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 700-110es (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140325
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '17 at 09:51
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 205 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 560 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 43.5 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 37.9 35% 41.3 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 34 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11451 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 340 (B1) Unknown 98 98 30 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11631794466	98% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 404 Mixed 410 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 40.8 150% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 105 90% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 155GB free Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 226340464 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 783 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 129744350 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14116 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 780 (B4) Unknown 100 100 898597701 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 72 59 4850253852 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 78 78 44492 (C2) HDA temperature 28 41 -140737488355300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.4% Good	Read 123 Write 115 Mixed 119 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.22 66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 119GB free Firmware: CR100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7616 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14576 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20953 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6361 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 6108526 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 65536 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4 (BE) vendor-specific 72 54 28 (C2) HDA temperature 154 97 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 6108526 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	28.2% Poor	Read 44 Write 54 Mixed 42.4 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.26 69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 44%
ST350032 0AS 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 18GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 21.8 Mixed 23.8 31% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.46 85% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB 7,464 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-110es Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP 700-110es

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GBBench 75%, 4,680 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples	2x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 20GBSamsungBench 47%, 5 samples	2x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 7,464 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383