HP 700-110es

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-110es  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '17 at 09:51
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 205
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 560
56% 457 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 37.9
35% 41.3 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 34
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 404
Mixed 410
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 40.8
150% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 105
90% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
155GB free
Firmware: HP34 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 123
Write 115
Mixed 119
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
119GB free
Firmware: CR100-13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 44
Write 54
Mixed 42.4
35% 46.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.26
69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 44%
ST350032 0AS 500GB
18GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 21.8
Mixed 23.8
31% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.46
85% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-110es Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-110es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback