Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 04:53
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 118
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 822
78% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,269
79% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 198
Parallax 207
146% 194 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 189
Splatting 128
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1331 1188 743 616 581 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 1,984
Mixed 1,569
SusWrite 977
376% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 53.8
174% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 663
525% 724 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 235%
Great: 410%
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
2TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 139 141 142 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 102%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 111 115 117 121 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 134
Write 129
Mixed 89.9
SusWrite 118
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.2
1,205% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75%
Great: 146%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 196 196 206 214 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%
Seagate ST16000VN001-2RV103 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 125 123 125 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 138%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$210
8.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 200 203 197 202 207 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
753GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 57.9
Write 87.3
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 96.2
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$87
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 181 181 177 182 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 192
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 179
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 33.1
Write 39
Mixed 31
SusWrite 20.7
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
263% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 135%
Seagate ST14000NM0018-2H4101 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: 0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3600C18 029E CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
2346, 2346, 2346, 2346 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $387

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback