Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 138
58% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 356
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 52.3
51% 58.2 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 55
Splatting 48.5
40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 518 438 369 380 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 614
Mixed 623
SusWrite 404
129% 572 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 52.1
167% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 392
293% 392 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 120%
Great: 300%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
242GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 154 150 157 155 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 67.6
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 149
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung LO8G1600CL11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback