Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 04:28
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 453
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 121
Parallax 60.5
68% 88.5 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 72
68% 85.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 33 7.6 37 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 428
Write 74.9
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 19.5
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 18.1
82% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.6
DQ Write 24.4
DQ Mixed 39.1
32% 48 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 97%
Team T253A3001T 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 49 58 8.4 49 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 433
Write 126
Mixed 14
SusWrite 47.4
33% 155 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.9
42% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
986GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 26.1
Mixed 28
SusWrite 17.7
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
259% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB
348GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 53
Write 26.9
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 16.6
37% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback