Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 75
1-Core 135
2-Core 265
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 793
74% 617 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.5% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 50.8
Parallax 46.2
42% 49.6 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 15 2.6 62 2.8 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 482
Write 349
Mixed 328
SusWrite 26.9
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 22.1
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 83.2
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 34.8
37% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 101%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
213GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 132 70 79 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 380
Write 262
Mixed 341
SusWrite 109
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 15.7
62% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 29.4
44% 86 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
303GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 61 61 74 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70% Good
Read 174
Write 164
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 69.6
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70%
Great: 113%
Asmt 2115 320GB
216GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 45 48 54 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 78.5
Write 76
Mixed 45
SusWrite 50.5
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$140
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 110 119 131 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 127
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 87%
ULT-Best FX-D0002. HDD 1TB
606GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 18 19 16 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 60.5
Write 21.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 17.8
37% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.6
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback