Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 42.7 1-Core 6.2 2-Core 46.7 21% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 82.2 8-Core 99.5 12% 90.8 Pts	64-Core 91.6 6% 91.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8130) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 3.09 2% 3.06 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.78 2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 206 228 227 244 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 372 Write 361 Mixed 255 SusWrite 217 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 20.3 76% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 141 109% 150 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 108%
Asmt 2115 320GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 296GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 17 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 16.7 16% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.7 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,527x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,766x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,192x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	404x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	383x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	351x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28