Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 LE  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 185
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 469
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 377.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 19.2
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.9
15% 19 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
214GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 337
Write 243
Mixed 182
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 12.6
84% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 23.4
45% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 250GB
85GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.5% Good
Read 260
Write 209
Mixed 187
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 13.5
105% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 21
55% 119 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 397
Mixed 396
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 35.5
160% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 77.1
111% 208 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 148
Mixed 142
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.3
113% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
691GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 103
Mixed 80.4
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.22
82% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
482GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 142
Write 128
Mixed 121
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.25
101% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 87%
asmedia ASMT1153e 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 140
Write 149
Mixed 110
170% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.28
99% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
NORELSYS 106X 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 131
Write 131
Mixed 117
162% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.25
77% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 70%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
420GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 106
Write 118
Mixed 96.2
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.25
91% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 72%
ASMT ASM1156-PM 4TB
418GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
Read 130
Write 141
Mixed 112
164% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.28
106% 1.32 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback