MSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A38
MotherboardMSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 23:00
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 313
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 841
88% 705 Pts
64-Core 1035
64% 1035 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
XFX(1EAE 6502) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 140
Parallax 244
95% 167 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 120
Splatting 184
142% 173 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 1TB
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2167 2022 2051 1157 1004 966 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,187
Write 2,315
Mixed 1,812
SusWrite 1,561
443% 1,969 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 24.4
125% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 41.4
DQ Write 3.6
DQ Mixed 8.1
10% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 221%
Great: 343%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
421GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 130 125 127 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 105
Write 138
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 123
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 89%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$68
460GB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 162 160 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 101
SusWrite 160
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 96%
SABRENT DISK00 500GB
4GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 54.6
Write 46
Mixed 26
SusWrite 53.3
59% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 176%
SABRENT DISK01 320GB
202GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 78.2
Write 79.9
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 74.1
92% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%
SABRENT DISK02 320GB
51GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 64.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 74
79% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 31%
SABRENT DISK03 500GB
107GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 97.2
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 2
72% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 33.5
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38) Builds (Compare 1,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B350M PRO-VDH (MS-7A38) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback