PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20190710 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 26 '24 at 17:59 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 25% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
HP(103C 2B49) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
36%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 32" | 1280 720 | MST0030 TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 560x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 533x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 470x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 217x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 199x |
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $964 |