Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 12:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 163
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 580
52% 438 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 85.5
56% 69.6 fps
MRender 48.7
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 36.9
41% 52.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 366
Mixed 334
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 30.7
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 68.5
84% 146 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$30
121GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 140 137 137 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 133
Write 149
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 139
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS541010B9E380 1TB
113GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 78.4
Write 81.4
Mixed 49
SusWrite 88.4
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 4133 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback