Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90C2004FSP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90C2004FSP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Aptio CRB
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141218
Uptime103 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 11:48
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 52.8
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 34.1
26% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 39.3
8-Core 39.2
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 41.4
3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 368D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B9E380 1TB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 47 49 45 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 69.9
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 46.2
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 66%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
7GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 3.6 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Read 0.3
Write 2.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 3
2% 1.47 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 1.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.9
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 151
27% 151 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90C2004FSP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 90C2004FSP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback