Today's hottest deals

Asus Z87-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130419
Uptime9 Days
Run DateDec 20 '15 at 19:35
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 498
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 22
Parallax 25.4
22% 24.9 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 29.5
21% 24.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 481
Mixed 481
109% 488 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 34.9
133% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 114
136% 237 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
52GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 45.2
Mixed 3.7
25% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.16
57% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
48GB free
Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 62.3
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.16
71% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
25GB free
Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 54.3
Mixed 52.4
44% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.16
66% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
12GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 84.6
Mixed 53.7
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.22
4K Mixed 0.31
104% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 1H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 78.6
Write 68.1
Mixed 94
61% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.34
78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
849GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 38
Write 39.3
Mixed 5.99
33% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.18
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
202GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
Read 38
Write 39.1
Mixed 38.6
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.9 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-DELUXE Builds (Compare 476 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $703
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback