Today's hottest deals

Asrock X79 Professional

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Professional  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
83% 143 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 709
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 329
Reflection 292
Parallax 363
268% 328 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 259
Splatting 190
210% 268 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 390 393 388 381 383 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 496
Write 232
Mixed 248
SusWrite 374
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 26.9
98% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 126
134% 226 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85%
Great: 116%
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
145GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 221 224 215 215 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 355
Write 235
Mixed 238
SusWrite 220
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 169
122% 160 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 111%
OCZ Vector 512GB-$400
107GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 382 397 373 371 369 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 472
Mixed 303
SusWrite 384
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 28.4
106% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 242
216% 325 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 112%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1243 1267 1194 1191 1190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,382
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,228
298% 1,324 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 54.5
188% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 581
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 525
392% 522 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 215%
Great: 578%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 17 28 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 103
Write 39.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 34.5
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 161 162 164 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 151
Write 130
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 163
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90%
Great: 113%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63
803GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 133 135 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 133
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 48.8
MC Mixed 44.4
135% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Professional Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Professional

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback