Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 03:42
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 36 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 35.6
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 136
42% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 489
42% 359 Pts
64-Core 1,565
97% 1,565 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P4-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 1206) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.9% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 137GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 458 531 453 428 453 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 42.5
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 224
18% 224 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback