Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory18.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 14:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Westmere E56xx/L56xx/X56xx (IBRS update)
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 177
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 179
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 69GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 844
Write 674
Mixed 730
167% 750 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 9.4
37% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 145
104% 134 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 20GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 1 0 64 0" 1920 1200
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback