Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130717
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '17 at 23:08
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 416
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 39
Parallax 51.8
35% 44.5 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 49
Splatting 36
37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 342
Mixed 337
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 24.2
136% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 65.6
113% 224 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 94%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
289GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 117
Mixed 124
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.16
56% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
148GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 129
Write 172
Mixed 129
108% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.24
71% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
48GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 108
Write 72.7
Mixed 76.7
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.38
86% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 68%
OCZ-AGIL ITY3 120GB
2GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 41
Write 42.5
Mixed 41.1
54% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 7.94
990% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 20.1
DQ Mixed 7.67
994% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback