Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte B365M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte B365M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$112
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 244
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 277
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 55.1
53% 60.8 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 54
Splatting 45.3
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0824A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 312
Mixed 329
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 21.9
92% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 42
82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 102%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
32GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 8.7
Mixed 4.7
13% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.1
194% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.9% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M DS3H Builds (Compare 9,590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B365M DS3H - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $457
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback