Alienware X51 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAlienware X51 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0PGRP5
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 485
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.6% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.2
79% 101 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 95.7
Splatting 97.7
78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 301 230 206 183 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 442
Mixed 339
SusWrite 229
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 42.8
141% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 327
247% 331 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 134%
Micron Crucial X6 SSD 2TB
858GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 204 210 50 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 240
Write 349
Mixed 236
SusWrite 126
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 22.1
72% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 128
97% 129 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 87%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$80
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 87.7
Write 88.7
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 72.8
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
189GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 88.9
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 99
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
SABRENT 500GB
83GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 74 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 38
SusWrite 74.9
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
21GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 67 69 71 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 56.4
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 65.5
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 121 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 46
SusWrite 119
133% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 49%
SABRENT DISK00 500GB
201GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 66
Write 61
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 65.2
77% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 176%
SABRENT DISK01 500GB
289GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 63 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 93.6
Write 85.3
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 66.3
100% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 155%
SABRENT DISK02 500GB
89GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 2 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 47.6
Write 47.7
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 5
41% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 162%
SABRENT DISK03 1TB
516GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 1 0.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 107
Write 107
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 3.7
88% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X51 R2 Builds (Compare 1,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Alienware X51 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback