Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 264
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 851
85% 691 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.2 fps
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1673 1593 1138 1119 995 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 1,875
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 1,110
352% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 71.8
250% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,172
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 939
699% 938 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 257%
Great: 296%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
310GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1017 1059 762 78 73 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,064
Write 1,067
Mixed 981
SusWrite 504
203% 904 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 70.6
248% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 432
366% 520 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 175%
Great: 253%
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
337GB free
Firmware: T0921A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 452 452 453 453 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 450
Mixed 392
SusWrite 452
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 22.1
129% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 28.3
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 183 183 182 183 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 132
Mixed 78
SusWrite 181
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
WDC WD10 EADS-65L5B1 1TB
287GB free, PID 1f03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 32.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 33
46% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB
121GB free, PID 7100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 35
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 35.6
44% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.1
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 25.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback