MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 07:05
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 318
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 945
94% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
MSI(1462 5082) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.1% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 83
33% 61.5 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 40
Splatting 24.5
40% 53 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 492 574 576 583 573 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,712
Write 1,848
Mixed 1,964
SusWrite 693
350% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 74
252% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 987
745% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 234%
Great: 300%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
887GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 76 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45% Average
Read 176
Write 92.4
Mixed 106
SusWrite 75.5
139% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45%
Great: 67%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68JCSN0 1TB
460GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.5 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.4% Very poor
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 1.8
80% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-19SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 76 76 75 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
Read 194
Write 72.4
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 76.3
120% 103 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 1
391% 7.33 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
390% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback