Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 085M2V
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Memory 17.2
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 24.4
12% 18.8 Pts
4-Core 34.2
8-Core 46.1
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 50.5
3% 50.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.6
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 211
Write 185
Mixed 136
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 6.3
20% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SABRENT 1TB
164GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.3
Write 73.2
Mixed 49.1
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
TS-RDF5A Transcend 128GB
38GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54.5
Write 39.1
Mixed 39.1
54% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 44%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.7
Write 51.8
Mixed 58.5
80% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
137% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 126%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 36 31 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 104
Write 96.8
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 34.2
97% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 74%
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 29 31 28 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 84.9
Write 103
Mixed 68
SusWrite 30.9
95% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 74%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
30GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 14 13 15 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 50
Write 90.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 13.4
76% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 73%
WDC WD20 EARS-22MVWB0 2TB
98GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7 7.8 6.9 8.2 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 57.1
Write 46.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 7
40% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 36%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
3TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 26 27 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 51.7
Write 106
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 26.1
89% 63 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
194GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 27 27 27 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 80.6
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 26.1
77% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 73%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
61GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 65.9
Write 74.3
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 26.4
71% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 58%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
108GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 75.4
Write 86.9
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 26.4
83% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.5
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 342
12% 342 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback