Asrock 890GX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 890GX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 21:34
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 96.5
47% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 242
26% 204 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 14.3
13% 16.4 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
824GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 125 125 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 104
Write 98.7
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 124
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 105%
Esata-2 ST6000DM003-2CY1 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 134 135 137 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64% Good
Read 85.3
Write 102
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 137
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
192% 2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
323GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 107 107 105 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 104
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 107
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 122 128 130 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 153
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 120
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 112%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
7.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 185 186 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 93.9
SusWrite 184
207% 155 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
123% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB PSD34G16002 PSD34G16002 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890GX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 890GX Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback