MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics92.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 15:19
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 116
50% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 166
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 172
Parallax 115
95% 135 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 101
Splatting 93.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 39 213 27 78 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 402
Write 332
Mixed 310
SusWrite 100
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 16.4
76% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 31.5
65% 127 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.6% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.3
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback