Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 02:22
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 129
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 291
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 43
38% 40.2 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.6
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 467
Write 396
Mixed 440
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 23.3
68% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 57.6
83% 155 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
296GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
289GB free
Firmware: 77.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 86.8
Write 88.2
Mixed 78.7
64% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.34
94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
258GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 59.2
Mixed 56.8
43% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.26
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 2567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 18.7
132% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
723GB free, PID 2567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 111
Write 149
Mixed 103
160% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 0.84 MB/s
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
408GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 28.7
Mixed 23.7
35% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.22
76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4 F3-12800CL9-4 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A160 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A160 12GB
800, 800, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P FX Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback