Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 12:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 181
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 464
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.69
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.9% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 31.1
23% 31.6 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 28.9
24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,596
Write 988
Mixed 994
264% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 21.9
98% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 307
218% 274 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 25.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback