Today's hottest deals

MSI GL75 Leopard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI GL75 Leopard  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-17E7
Memory51.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 06:18
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 177
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 464
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 88.9
75% 88.7 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 75.4
71% 89 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 1001 651 82 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,105
Mixed 880
SusWrite 474
205% 916 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 47.7
157% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 270
269% 437 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 149%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E7 Builds (Compare 1,907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GL75 Leopard - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback