Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 18:20
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 302
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,022
98% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 128
Parallax 170
92% 137 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 117
Splatting 85.7
83% 104 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 537GB
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 1260 1304 1332 1337 1333 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 60%
Red Hat VirtIO 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 160 149 158 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 121
Write 157
Mixed 133
SusWrite 154
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 98%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 181 174 179 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 164
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 178
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback