Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory50.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 50.8GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory41.3 GB free of 50.7813 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 16:57
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 11 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 264
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 835
81% 668 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 115
Parallax 219
118% 160 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 142
Splatting 162
117% 139 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 114%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,882
Write 2,998
Mixed 3,745
2,916% 3,875 MB/s
4K Read 81.6
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 66.1
12,196% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 272
2,242% 215 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
189GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 245 49 49 49 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 4TB
250GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 89 89 88 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 87.6
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 98%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
182GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 74 73 74 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 100
Write 94.3
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 72.8
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 48 48 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 97.5
Write 89.6
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 48
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 50GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 2848 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 38.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 95%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback