Acer Aspire A517-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A517-52  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jasmine_TL
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 15:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 22.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 257
70% 142 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 582
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 149D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8439
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 28.9
20% 26.2 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 0.3
12% 16 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 653 285 286 280 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,180
Write 885
Mixed 932
SusWrite 433
192% 858 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 55.8
189% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 531
402% 551 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 157%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 7.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 5.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 302
13% 302 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A517-52 Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A517-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback