Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A514-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Lily_TL
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230421
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 10:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 180
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 261
32% 246 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1468) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 12
8% 10.2 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.3
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 568 567 267 168 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 743
Write 652
Mixed 659
SusWrite 371
136% 606 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 29.8
107% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 270
190% 241 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 7.2
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 15 60 14" 1536 841 BOE081D
Typical Aspire A514-54 Builds (Compare 1,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback