MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 03:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 423
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0927) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 99 122 66 60 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 476
Write 334
Mixed 353
SusWrite 112
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 35
140% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 191
168% 247 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
929GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 185 182 187 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 174
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 186
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
165% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4G-2666-CL191 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.2% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 20.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback