MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 147
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 276
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7C51) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 439 442 454 457 457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 448
Mixed 376
SusWrite 440
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 35.2
131% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 192
173% 258 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4G-2666-CL191 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,907 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback