Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_P1510CJA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_P1510CJA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509JA
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 05:16
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 162
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 241
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 7
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 3.6
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 794
Write 129
Mixed 188
79% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 29.7
126% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 155
124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 187%
FSS SSD 17TB
15.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 11
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 11.4
22% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
103% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_P1510CJA Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_P1510CJA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback