Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X415EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X415EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 05:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 49
1-Core 129
2-Core 132
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 167
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 14.1
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 16.5
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 130 134 125 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 681
Write 128
Mixed 224
SusWrite 128
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 21.6
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 94.9
DQ Mixed 161
119% 160 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 187%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
686GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 75 51 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 82.7
Mixed 44
SusWrite 67.7
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 10.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 8.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X415EA Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_X415EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback