Today's hottest deals

MSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A44
MotherboardMSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 09:01
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 654
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36D9) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 28.5
25% 30.1 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 29
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 490
Write 125
Mixed 185
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 3.09
55% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 3.3
5% 10 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
908GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 175
Write 89.7
Mixed 115
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.23
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.19
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 24.1
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44) Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI E3M WORKSTATION V5 (MS-7A44)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback